I was eating lunch the other day with a colleague and the conversation turned to guns. Like most Brits, he considered Texans' paranoid clinging to their guns and the 2nd Amendment both outdated and just plain stupid - although he was too kind to use the latter word. Of course a wide ranging conversation quickly ensured covering all the usual arguments at least once.
There were a few misconceptions of the constitutional position,
such as the idea that gun ownership does not prevent tyranny because many
European nations did not have guns and their governments had not become
tyrannical. (Debate of that assertion was reserved for another lunch. But that’s analogous to saying that sprinkler systems don’t keep
buildings from burning down because one knows of several buildings without
sprinkler systems that haven’t burned down. It should be obvious that if the buildings haven’t burned down it’s because no one started them burning, not proof that sprinkler systems are unnecessary. Sprinkler systems do impede or stop a fire once it’s started just like guns impede or stop the advance of tyranny when such sins break out from rulers.)
But the most interesting and revealing comment came following a comparison
of the gun death numbers in both countries.
Honest Liberal: Gun deaths in the UK are
only 35 compared to 35,000 in the US.
Me: Yes, but violent crime is far higher in the UK than in the US. I
pointed him to a UK site with some figures. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1196941/The-violent-country-Europe-Britain-worse-South-Africa-U-S.html
I thought this data from a British source showing a violent
crime rate over 4x the rate in the United States (466 compared to 2034) would surely be convincing.
While that was not the case, his response did turn out to be highly revealing.
Honest Liberal: OK ... I'll give you that ... statistically more
people in Britain may say they have been victims of crime ... but they are
alive to talk about it. Getting your purse snatched versus being mowed down
with a fire arm ... that's the choice.
Therein lies the heart of the difference. Liberals would rather
have their life than their freedom. They would rather live in a world of petty
robbery, home burglary, muggings, government directed health care, government
mandated education, government monopoly money, government supervised
sanitation, government provided water, government approved food, with
confiscatory taxation to implement it all and be alive to talk about it than
risk death in the cause of liberty.
Of course, liberals want freedom too- freedom to watch the movie
of their choice and vacation in the country of their choice, freedom to choose
which company will send 3/4 of their pay to the government and which government
approved doctor will oversee their health, freedom to vote for which politician
will drop the tax on them 10% and raise it 20% on the other guy, freedom to
either walk or drive their 1.1 children to the government mandated school,
freedom to go to bed at the time of their choosing, freedom from being fired by
their employer or injured in their wood shop, and freedom to be robbed and live
to talk about it.
Nothing illustrates the contrast between liberals and patriots
better than to compare this actual conversation about how liberals view life
with this actual flag about how patriots view liberty.
This is the Troutman flag hanging in the Texas State Bar building
in Austin, TX. It is blue pigment on a plain white sheet. In 1835 the Texan's fight for independence from the Mexican confederation attracted attention throughout the United States. Although the US rightfully did not entangle itself in this foreign issue, hundreds of individuals properly responded to the call for help. This flag was made by 18 year old Joanna Troutman for one such group from Macon, GA.
The flag was raised when the Georgians arrived at Velasco and became an inspirational symbol in the dark months leading up to the victory at San Jacinto. Virtually the entire GA command along with the Red Rovers from Alabama and the Texans under Col Fannin were taken prisoner and massacred following losses at Refugio and Colete.
Those who are unwilling to risk their life in the cause of liberty usually have neither. Those who
are willing to risk their life for the sake of honor and liberty usually have both. But yes, the tree of
liberty does need watered with the blood of patriots from time to time.
Friday, January 18, 2013
An Honest Liberal
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment